References

A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z
    A
  • Ahlsén, E., & Strömqvist, S. (1999). ScriptLog: A tool for logging the writing process and its possible diagnostic use. In F. Loncke, J. Clibbens, H. Arvidson & L. Lloyd (Eds.), Augmentative and Alternative Communication: New Directions in Research and Practice (pp. 144-149). London: Whurr.
  • Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (Eds.). (2001). Through the models of writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Alamargot, D., Chesnet, D., & Caporossi, G. (2012). Using eye and pen movements to study the writing process. In M. Fayol, D. Alamargot & V. W. Berninger (Eds.), Translation of Thought to Written Text While Composing: Advancing Theory, Knowledge, Research Methods, Tools, and Applications (pp. 315-337): Psychology Press.
  • Alamargot, D., Chesnet, D., Dansac, C., & Ros, C. (2006). Eye and Pen: a new device to study reading during writing. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 38(2), 287-299.
  • Alvés, R. A., Castro, S. L., de Sousa, L., & Strömqvist, S. (2007). Influence of typing skill on pause-execution cycles in written composition. In M. Torrance, D. Galbraith & L. Van Waes (Eds.), Recents developpements in writing-process research (Vol. 20, pp. 55-65). Dordrecht-Boston-London: Kluwer Academic Press.
  • Alves, R. A., Castro, S. L., & Olive, T. (2008). Execution and pauses in writing narratives: Processing time, cognitive effort and typing skill. International Journal of Psychology, 43(6), 969-979.
  • B
  • Baaijen, V. M., Galbraith, D., & De Glopper, K. (2012). Keystroke analysis: Reflections on procedures and measures. Written Communication, 29(3), 246-277. Beauvais, C., Olive, T., & Passerault, J.-M. (2011). Why are some texts good and others not? Relationship between text quality and management of the writing process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 415-428.
  • Baaijen, V. M., Galbraith, D., & de Glopper, K. (2012). Keystroke logging: Reflections on procedures and measures. Written Communication, 29(3): 247–277.
  • Barbier, M.-L., & Jullien, N. (2009). On-line tools for investiganting writing strategies in L2. German as a foreign language (this issue).
  • Barr, D. J. (2008). Analysing 'visual world' eyetracking data using multilevel regression. Journal of Memory and Language, in press.
  • Beauvais, L., Favart, M., Passerault, J.-M., & Beauvais, C. (2014). Temporal management of the writing process: Effects of genre and organizing constraints in grades 5, 7, and 9 Written Communication, 31, 251-279.
  • Becker, A. (2006). A review of writing model research based on cognitive processes. In A. Horning & A. Becker (Eds.), Revision: History, theory and practice (pp. 25-49). West Lafayette, Indiana: Parlor Press.
  • Berg, T. (2002). Slips of the typewriter key. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 185-207.
  • Berninger, V. W., Fuller, F., & Whitaker, D. (1996). A process model of writing development across life span. Educational Psychology Review, 8(3), 193-218.
  • Blau, S. (1983). Invisible writing: Investigating cognitive processes in writing. College, Composition and Communication, 34, 297-312.
  • Bosman, E. A. (1993). Age-Related Differences in the Motoric Aspects of Transcription Typing Skill. Psychology and Aging, 8(1), 87-102.
  • Braaksma, M. (2002). Observational learning in argumentative writing. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Amsterdam.
  • Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., Van den Bergh, H., & Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2004). Observational learning and its effects on the orchestration of writing processes. Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 1-36.
  • Braaksma, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Van den Bergh, H. (2009). Hypertext writing: Effects on writing processes and writing products. Paper presented at the 13th Biennial Earli Conference, August 25th - 29th 2009, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Breetvelt, I., Van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1994). Relations between writing processes and text quality: When and how? Cognition and Instruction, 12(2), 103-123.
  • Breetvelt, I., Van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1996). Rereading and generating and their relation to text quality: An application of multilevel analysis on writing process data. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. Van den Bergh & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models, and methodology in writing research (pp. 10-20). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Bridwell, L. S. (1989). Designing research on computer assisted learning. Computers and Composition, 7(1), 79-91.
  • Bridwell, L. S., & Duin, A. H. (1985). Looking in-depth at writers: Computers as writing medium and research tool. In J. L. Collins & E. A. Sommers (Eds.), Writing On-Line (pp. 115-121). Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
  • Byrd, D. R. (2011). Putting the writing process into action in the L2 classroom: Pre-writing techniques that work. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 64-77.
  • C
  • Caporossi, G., Alamargot, D., & Chesnet, D. (2004). Using the computer to study the dynamics of handwriting processes. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3245(242-254).
  • Carl, M., & Dragsted, B. (2012). Inside the monitor model: Processes of default and challenged translation production. Translation: Computation, Corpora, Cognition, 2(1), 127-145.
  • Chukharev-Hudilainen, E. (2014). Pauses in spontaneous written communication: a keystroke logging study. Journal of Writing Research, 6(1), 61-84.
  • Coirier, P., Andriessen, J., & Chanquoy, L. (2000). From planning to translating: The specificity of argumentative writing. Foundations of Argumentative Text Processing (pp. 1-28). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Concha, S., & Paratore, J. R. (2011). Local coherence in persuasive writing: An exploration of Chilean students' metalinguistic knowledge, writing process, and writing products. Written Communication, 28, 34-69.
  • Cooper, W. E. (1983). Introduction. In W. E. Cooper (Ed.), Cognitive Aspects of Skilled Typewriting (pp. 1-38). New York, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer.
  • Cooper, W. E. (Ed.). (1983). Cognitive Aspects of Skilled Typewriting. New York, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer.
  • Coover, J. E. (1923). A method of teaching typewriting based upon a psychological analysis of expert typing. National Education Association, 61, 561-567.
  • Couzijn, M. (1999). Learning to write by observation of writing and reading processes: Effects on learning and transfer. Learning and Instruction, 9, 109-142.
  • D
  • Daiute, C. A. (1986). Physical and cognitive factors in revising: Insight from studies with computers. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 141-159.
  • Dam-Jensen, H., & Heine, C. (2013). Writing and translation process research: Bridging the gap. . Journal of Writing Research, 5(1), 89-101.
  • De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (1997). Effects of dictation and advanced planning instruction on the composing of students with writing and learning problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 203-222.
  • De Smet, M. J. R. (2013). Composing the unwritten text: Effects of electronic outlining on students' argumentative writing performance. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Open University, Heerlen.
  • De Smet, M. J. R., Brand-Gruwel, S., Leijten, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2014). Electronic outlining as a writing Strategy:Effects on students' writing products, mental effort and writing process. Computers and Education. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.010
  • Degenhardt, M. (2006). Camtasia and Catmovie: Two digital tools for observing, documenting and analysing writing processes of university students. In L. Van Waes, M. Leijten & C. Neuwirth (Eds.), Writing and Digital Media (Vol. 17, pp. 180-188). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Diehl, M. J., & Seibel, R. (1962). The relative importance of visual and auditory feedback in speed typewriting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 46(5), 365-369.
  • Dragsted, B., & Carl, M. (2013). Towards a classification of translation styles based on eye-tracking and keylogging data. Journal of Writing Research, 5(1), 133-158.
  • Duijnhouwer, H. (2010). Feedback effects on students' writing motivation, process and performance. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Utrecht University.
  • Dvorak, A. (1943). There is a Better Typewriter Keyboard. National Business Education Quarterly, 11, 51-58, 66.
  • Dvorak, A., Merrick, N. L., Dealey, W. L., & Ford, G. C. (1936). Typewriting behavior. New York: American Book Company.
  • E
  • Ehrensberger-Dow, M., & Massey, G. (2013). Indicators of translation competence: Translators' self-concepts and the translation of titles, Journal of Writing Research, 5(1), 103-131
  • Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 59-84. doi: 10.10170/S0272263104261034
  • Englert, C. S., Zhao, Y., Dunsmore, K., Collings, N. Y., & Wolbers, K. (2007). Scaffolding the writing of students with disabilities through procedural facilitation: Using an internet-based technology to improve performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(1), 9-29.
  • Englund Dimitrova, B. (2006). Segmentation of the writing process in translation: experts vs. novices. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer Keystroke Logging: Methods and Applications (Vol. 18, pp. 189-201). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Epting, L. K., Gallena, E. M., Hicks, S. A., Palmer, E. N., & Weisberg, T. (2013). Read and think before you write: Prewriting rime and level of print exposure as factors in writing and revision. Journal of Writing Research, 4(3), 239-259.
  • Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-Term Working Memory. Psychological Review, 102(2), 211-245.
  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251.
  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. (2nd ed.). Boston: MIT Press.
  • F
  • Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32, 400-414.
  • Fartoukh, M., Chanquoy, L., & Piolat, A. (2012). Effects of emotion on writing processes in children. Written Communication, 29, 391-411.
  • Favart, M., & Coirier, P. (2006). Acquisition of the linearization process in text composition in third to ninth graders: Effects of textual superstructure and macrostructural organization. Springer, 35, 305-328.
  • Fendrick, P. (1937). Hierarchical skills in typewriting. Journal of Educational Psychology, 28, 609-620.
  • Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31-50). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
  • Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.
  • Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1985). 'Talking about protocols'. . College Composition and Communication, 37, 16-54.
  • Flower, L., Hayes, J. R., Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis and the strategies of revision. College, Composition and Communication, 37, 16-55.
  • Fox, J. G., & Stansfield, R. G. (1964). Digram keying times for typists. Ergonomics, 7(3), 317-320.
  • G
  • Galbraith, D. (1992). Conditions for discovery through writing. Instructional Science, 21, 45-72.
  • Galbraith, D. (1996). Self-monitoring, discovery through writing and individual differences in drafting strategy. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. Van den Bergh & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, Models and Methodology in Writing Research (Vol. 1, pp. 121-141). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Galbraith, D. (1999). Writing as a knowledge constituting process. In M. Torrance & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing what to Write: Conceptual Processes in text Production (pp. 139-160). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Galbraith, D. (2001). Writing instruction. In N. J. Smelser and P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 16625-16629. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
  • Galbraith, D. (2009). Cognitive models of writing. GFL - German as a Foreign Language, 2-3, 7-22.
  • Galbraith, D. (2009). Writing about what we know. In D. Myhill, R. Beard, M. Nystrand, & J. Riley (eds.), Handbook of Writing Development. London: Sage Publications.
  • Galbraith, D. (2009). Writing as discovery. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II (6), 1-27.
  • Galbraith, D. and Rijlaarsdam, G. (1999). Effective strategies for the teaching and learning of writing. Learning and Instruction, 9, 93-108.
  • Galbraith, D. and Torrance, M. (1999). Conceptual processes in writing: From problem solving to text production. In M. Torrance and D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing What to Write (pp. 1-12). Amsterdam, NL: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Galbraith, D., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1999). Effective strategies for the teaching and learning of writing. Learning and Instruction, 9, 93-108.
  • Galbraith, D., & Torrance, M. (2004). Revision in the context of different drafting strategies. In L. Allal, L. Chanquoy & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and Instructional Processes (pp. 63-86). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Galbraith, D., Ford, S., Walker, G., & Ford, J. (2005). The contribution of different components of working memory to planning in writing. L1 – Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 15, 113-145.
  • Galbraith, D., van Waes, L. & Torrance, M. (2007). Writing and cognition. In M. Torrance, L. van Waes, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and Cognition (pp. 1-7). Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier.
  • Gebhardt, R. C. (1983). Writing processes, revision, and rhetorical problems: A note on three recent articles. College Composition and Communication, 34(3), 294-296.
  • Gentner, D. R. (1982). Evidence against a central control model of timing in typing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 793-810.
  • Gentner, D. R. (1982). Testing the central control model of typing: Comments on the reply by Viviani and Terzuolo. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 814-816.
  • Gentner, D. R. (1983). Keystroke Timing in Transcription Typing. In W. E. Cooper (Ed.), Cognitive Aspects of Skilled Typewriting (pp. 95-120). New York, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer.
  • Gentner, D. R. (1983). The acquisition of typewriting skill. Acta Psychologica, 54, 233-248.
  • Gentner, D. R. (1987). Timing of skilled motor performance: Tests of the proportional duration model. Psychological Review, 94, 255-276.
  • Gentner, D. R. (1988). Expertise in typewriting. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 1-21). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
  • Gentner, D. R., Grudin, J. T., & Conway, E. (1980). Finger movements in transcription typing. La Jolla, CA.
  • Gentner, D. R., Grudin, J. T., Larochelle, S., Norman, D. A., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1983). A Glossary of Terms Including a Classification of Typing Errors. In W. E. Cooper (Ed.), Cognitive Aspects of Skilled Typewriting (pp. 39-43). New York, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer.
  • Gentner, D. R., Larochelle, S., & Grudin, J. T. (1988). Lexical, sublexical, and peripheral effects in skilled typewriting. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 524-548.
  • Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1), 1-24.
  • Grabowski, J. (1996). Writing and speaking: Common grounds and differences towards a regulation theory of written language production. In C. M. Levy & S. E. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 73-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Grabowski, J. (2008). The internal structure of university students' keyboard skills. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 27-52.
  • Greene, S., & Higgins, L. (1994). 'Once upon a time': the use of retrospective accounts in building theory in composition. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Speaking about Writing (pp. 115-140). London: Sage.
  • Grudin, J. T. (1983). Error Patterns in Novice and Skilled Transcription Typing. In W. E. Cooper (Ed.), Cognitive Aspects of Skilled Typewriting (pp. 121-143). New York, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer.
  • Grudin, J. T. (1983). Non-Hierarchic Specification of Components in Transcription Typewriting. Acta Psychologica, 54, 249-262.
  • Grudin, J. T., & Larochelle, S. (1982). Digraph frequency effects in skilled typing. CHIP Technical Report(110).
  • H
  • Haas, C. (1989). 'Seeing it on the screen isn't really seeing it': Computer writers' reading problems. In G. E. Hawisher & C. L. Selfe (Eds.), Critical perspectives on computers (pp. 16-29). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Haas, C. (1989). Does the medium make the difference? Two studies of writing with pen and paper and with computers. Human-Computer Interaction, 10, 149-169.
  • Haas, C. (1989). How the writing medium shapes the writing process: Effects of word processing on planning. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 181-207.
  • Haas, C. (2006). Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hacker, D. J., Keener, M. C., & Kircher, J. C. (2009). Writing is applied metacognition. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 154-172). New York: Routledge.
  • Hacker, D. J., Plum, C., Butterfield, E. C., Quathamer, D., & Heineken, E. (1994). Text Revision: Detection and Corection of errors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 65-76.
  • Halverson, A., Horn, D. B., Karat, C., & Karat, J. (1999). The beauty of errors: Patterns of error correction in desktop speech systems. Paper presented at the Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 1999, Edinburgh.
  • Hansen, G. E. (1999). Probing the Process in Translation: Methods and Results (Vol. 24). Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
  • Harris, K. R., Schmidt, T., & Graham, S. (1997). Strategies or composition and self-regulation in the writing process. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, D. Deshler & M. Pressley (Eds.), Teaching every children every day learning in divserse schools and classrooms: Brookline Books.
  • Hartley, J., Howe, M., & McKeachie, M. (2001). Writing through time: Longitudinal studies of the effects of new technology on writing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 141-151.
  • Hartley, J., Sotto, E., & Pennebaker, J. (2003). Speaking versus typing: A case-study of the effects of using voice-recognition software on academic correspondence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 5-16.
  • Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. E. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1-27). Mahwah: New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new model of cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 1-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hayes, J. R. (2011). Kinds of Knowledge-Telling: Modeling early writing development. Journal of Writing Research, 3(2), 73-92.
  • Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369-388. doi: 10.1177/0741088312451260
  • Hayes, J. R. (2012). My past and present as writing researcher and thoughts about the future of writing research. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), Past, present and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology (pp. 3-25). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Hayes, J. R., & Chenoweth, N. (2006). Is Working Memory Involved in the Transcribing and Editing of Texts? Written Communication, 23(2), 135.
  • Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. (1986). Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist, 41, 1106-1113.
  • Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive Processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hayes, J. R., Flower, L., Schriver, K., Statman, J., & Carey, L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Reading, writing, and language possessing (Vol. 2, pp. 176-240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Holmqvist, K., Holsanova, J., Johansson, V., & Strömqvist, S. (2004). Perceiving and Producing the Frog Story. In D. Ravid & H. B.-Z. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development. Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman (pp. 293-306). Dordrect: Kluwer Academic Press.
  • Holmqvist, K., Holsanova, J., Johansson, V., & Strömqvist, S. (in press). Perceiving and producing the frog story. In H. Ravid & H. Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Holmqvist, K., Johansson, V., Strömqvist, S., & Wengelin, Å. (2002). Studying reading and writing on-line. In S. Strömqvist (Ed.), The diversity of languages and language learning (pp. 103-123). Lund: Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.
  • Honeycutt, L. (2003). Researching the use of voice recognition writing software. Computers and Composition, 20, 77-95.
  • Honeycutt, L. (2004). Literacy and the writing voice: The intersection of culture and technology in dictation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18(3), 294-327.
  • I
  • Inhoff, A. W. (1991). Word-Frequency During Copytyping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17(2), 478-487.
  • Inhoff, A. W., & Gordon, A. M. (1997). Eye movements and eye-hand coordination during typing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6(6), 153-157.
  • Inhoff, A. W., & Jian, W. (1992). Encoding of Text, Manual Movement Planning, and Eye Hand Coordination During Copytyping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(2), 437-448.
  • Inhoff, A. W., & Wang, J. (1992). Encoding of text, manual movement planning, and eye-hand coordination during copytyping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(2), 437-448.
  • Inhoff, A. W., Briihl, D., Bohemier, G., & Wann, J. P. (1992). Eye-Hand Span and Coding of Text During Copytyping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(2), 298-306.
  • Inhoff, A. W., Topolski, R., & Wann, J. P. (1992). Saccade Programming During Short Duration Fixations - an Examination of Copytyping, Letter Detection, and Reading. Acta Psychologica, 81(1), 1-21.
  • Inhoff, A., Eiter, B., Radach, R., & Juhasz, B. (2003). Distinct subsystems for the parafoveal processing of spatial and linguistic information during eye fixations in reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56(5), 803-827.
  • Isaacson, S. (2004). Instruction that helps students meet state standards in writing. Exceptionality, 12(1), 39-54.
  • J
  • Jakobsen, A. L. (2003). Effects of think aloud on translation speed, revision and segmentation. In F. Alves (Ed.), Triangulating Translation: Perspectives in process oriented research (Vol. 45, pp. 69-95). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
  • Jakobsen, A. L. (2006). Translog: Research methods in translation. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer Keystroke Logging:Methods and Applications (Vol. 18, pp. 95-105). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Jakobsen, A. L. (forthcoming). Effects of Think Aloud on Translation Speed, Revision and Segmentation. In F. Alves (Ed.), Triangulating Translation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
  • Jakobsen, A. L., & Schou, L. (1999). Translog documentation. In G. Hansen (Ed.), Probing the process in translation: methods and results. (Vol. 24). Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
  • Janssen, D., Van Waes, L., & Van den Bergh, H. (1996). Effects of thinking aloud on writing processes. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, individual differences, and applications (pp. 233-250). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Johansson, R., Johansson, V., Wengelin, A., & Holmqvist, K. (2008). Reading during writing: Four different groups of writers. Working papers, 53, 43-59.
  • Johansson, R., Wengelin, A., Johansson, V., & Holmqvist, K. (2010). Looking at the keyboard or the monitor: Relationship with text production processes. Reading and Writing, 23(7), 835-851.
  • Johansson, V. (2003). Developing editing. In M. Aparici (Ed.), Working Papers in Developing literacy across genres, modalities and languages (Vol. 3, pp. 235-249). Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.
  • Johansson, V., Title, Author/s, Literature, D. s. C. f. L. a., PDF, F.-t. A. a., 2009-11-07, D. d., et al. (2009). Developmental Aspects of Text Production in Writing and Speech. Unpublished PhD, University of Lund, Lund.
  • K
  • Kellogg, R. T. (1988). Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 4(2), 355-365.
  • Kellogg, R. T. (1990). Effectiveness of prewriting strategies as a function of task demands. The American Journal of Psychology, 103(3), 327-342.
  • Kellogg, R. T. (1994). The psychology of writing. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1-26.
  • Kellogg, R. T., & Whiteford, A. P. (2009). Training advances writing skills: The case for deliberate practice. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 250-266.
  • Kellogg, R. T., Whiteford, A. P., Turner, C. E., Cahill, M., & Mertens, A. (2013). Working memory in written composition: An evaluation of the 1996 model. Journal of Writing Research, 5(2), 159-190.
  • Kieft, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., Galbraith, D., & Berg, v. d. H. (2007). The effects of adapting a writing course to students' writing strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 565-578.
  • Kieft, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., Galbraith, D., & van den Bergh, H. (2007). The effects of adapting a writing course to students’ writing strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 565–578.
  • Kim, H. C. (1996). Diagnosing and filtering typing error corrections in text revision history (No. TRITA-NA-P9633). Stockholm: Department of Numerical Analysis and Computing Science, Royal Institute of Technology.
  • King, C. L. (2012). Reverse outlining: A method for effective revision of document structure. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 55(3), 254-261.
  • Klemmer, E. T. (1971). Keyboard entry. Applied Ergonomics, 2(1), 2-6.
  • Knobloch, C. (1996). Historisch-systematischer Aufriß der psychologischen Schreibforschung. In H. Günther & O. Ludwig (Eds.), Handbuch Schrift und Schriftlichkeit (Vol. 10, pp. 983-992). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
  • Kollberg, P. (1998). S-notation - a computer based method for studying and representing text composition. Unpublished Licentiate, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm.
  • Kollberg, P., & Severinson Eklundh, K. (2001). Studying writers'revision patterns with S-notation analysis. In T. Olive & C. M. Levy (Eds.), Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing (Vol. 10, pp. 89-104). Dordecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Koutsoftas, A. D., & Gray, S. (2012). A structural equation model of the writing process in typically-developing sixth grade children. Reading and Writing, 26(6), 941-966.
  • Kozma, R. B. (1991). Computer-based writing tools and the cognitive needs of novice writers. Computers and Composition, 8(2), 31-45.
  • Kucer, S. L. (1985). The making of meaning: Reading and writing as parellel processes. Written Communication, 2(3), 317-336.
  • L
  • Lacquaniti, F., Terzuolo, C. A., & Viviani, P. (1983). The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. Acta Psychologica, 54, 115-130.
  • Lane, K. L., Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Weisenbach, J. L. (2006). Teaching strategies to young students struggling with writing and at risk for behavioral disorders: Self-Regulated Strategy Development. Teaching Exeptional Children, 39(1), 60-64.
  • Larochelle, S. (1983). A Comparison of skilled and novice performance in discontinuous typing. In W. E. Cooper (Ed.), Cognitive Aspects of Skilled Typewriting (pp. 67-94). New York, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer.
  • Larochelle, S. (1984). Some aspects of movement in skilled typewriting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance. Control of language processes (Vol. Vol.10, pp. 43-54). Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.
  • Leijen, D. A. J., & Leontjeva, A. (2012). Linguistic and review features of peer feedback and their effect on the implementation of changes in academic writing: A corpus based investigation. Journal of Writing Research, 4(2), 177-202.
  • Leijten, M. (2007). How do writers adapt to speech recognition software? The influence of learning styles on writing processes in speech technology environments. In M. Torrance, L. Van Waes & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and Cognition: Research and Applications (Vol. 20, pp. 279-292). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Leijten, M. (2007). Writing and speech recognition: observing error correction strategies of professional writers (Vol. 160). Utrecht: LOT.
  • Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2001). The Influence of Voice Recognition on the Writing Process: Cognitive and Stylistic Effect of Speech Technology on Writing Business Texts. In M. Hirose (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT'01 (pp. 783-784). Chicago/Tokyo/London: IOS Press.
  • Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2003). The writing processes and learning strategies of initial users of speech recognition: a case study on the adaption process of two professional writers (Research Report No. 2003022). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2005). Inputlog: A logging tool for the research of writing processes (Research Papers, Faculty of Applied Economics ). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2005). Writing with speech recognition: The adaptation process of professional writers with and without dictating experience. Interacting with Computers, 17(6), 736-772.
  • Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2006). Inputlog: New perspectives on the logging of on-lin writing processes in a Windows environment. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer Key-Stroke Logging and Writing: Methods and Applications. (Vol. 18, pp. 73-94). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2006). Repair strategies in writing with speech recognition: The effect of experience with classical dictating. In L. Van Waes, M. Leijten & C. Neuwirth (Eds.), Writing and Digital Media (Vol. 17, pp. 31-46). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2013). Keystroke logging in writing research: Using inputlog to analyze and visualize writing processes. Written Communication, 30, 358-392.
  • Leijten, M., De Ridder, I., Ransdell, S., & Van Waes, L. (2007). The effect of errors in the text produced so far strategy decisions based on error span, input mode, and lexicality. Research paper University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics, 9, 33.
  • Leijten, M., Hoste, V., Van Waes, L., Macken, L., & Van Horenbeeck, E. (2012). From character to word level: Enabling the linguistic analyses of Inputlog. Paper presented at the EACL 2012 Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Writing, Avignon, France.
  • Leijten, M., Van Waes, L., Schriver, K., & Hayes, J. R. (2014). Writing in the workplace: Constructing documents using multiple digital sources. Journal of Writing Research, 5(3), 285-337.
  • Levy, B. A., Di Persio, R., & Hollingshead, A. (1992). Fluent rereading: Repetition, automaticity, and discrepancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 957-971.
  • Levy, C. M., & Marek, P. (1999). Testing components of Kellogg's multicomponent models of Working Memory in writing: The role of the phonological loop. In M. Torrance & G. Jeffery (Eds.), The cognitive demands of writing. Processing capacity and Working Memory effects in text production. (Vol. 3, pp. 25-41). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Levy, C. M., & Ransdell, S. E. (1995). Is writing as difficult as it seems ? Memory & Cognition, 23, 767-779.
  • Levy, C. M., & Ransdell, S. E. (1996). The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Levy, C. M., & Ransdell, S. E. (1996). Writing signatures. In C. M. Levy & S. E. Ransdell (Eds.), The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications (pp. 149-162). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Levy, C. M., & Ransdell, S. E. (2001). Writing with concurrent memory loads. In T. Olive & C. M. Levy (Eds.), Contemporary Tools and Techniques for Studying Writing (pp. 9-29). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Lindgren, E. (2002). The LS graph: A methodology for visualising writing revision. Language Learning, 52(3), 565-595.
  • Lindgren, E. (2004). The uptake of peer-based intervention in the writing classroom. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. Van den Bergh & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Effective learning and teaching of writing (Vol. 14, pp. 259-274). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Lindgren, E. (2005). Writing and Revising: Didactic and Methodological Implications of Keystroke Logging. (Skrifter från moderna språk, No. 18). Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University, Department of Modern Languages.
  • Lindgren, E. (2005). Writing and Revising: Didactic and Methodological Implications of Keystroke Logging. Unpublished PhD thesis, Umeå University, Umeå.
  • Lindgren, E. (2007). GIS for writing: Applying geographic information system techniques to data-mine writing's cognitive processes. In M. Torrance, L. Van Waes & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and Cognition: Methods and Applications (Vol. 20, pp. 83-96). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2001). Encouraging Reflection in University Writing. In B. Bylund (Ed.), Lärares liv, vision and verklighet (pp. 102-109). Umeå Universitetspedagogiskt centrum - Umeå University.
  • Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2002). The LS graph: A methodology for visualising writing revision. Language Learning, 52(3), 565-595.
  • Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2003). Stimulated recall as a trigger for increasing noticing and languaga awareness in the L2 writing classroom: A case study of two young female writers. Language Awareness, 12, 172-186.
  • Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2003). Stimulated recall as a trigger for increasing noticing and language awareness in the L2 writing classroom: A case study of two young female writers. Language Awareness, 12, 172-186.
  • Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2006). Analysing on-line revision. In E. Lindgren & K. P. H. Sullivan (Eds.), Computer Keystroke Logging: Methods and Applications (Vol. 18, pp. 157-188). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2006). Analyzing on-line revision. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer Key-Stroke Logging: Methods and Applications (Vol. 18, pp. 157-188). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2006). Writing and the analysis of revision: An overview. In E. Lindgren & K. P. H. Sullivan (Eds.), Computer Keystroke Logging: Methods and Applications (Vol. 18, pp. 31-44). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2009). Supporting Learner Reflection in the Language Translation Class. In M. Chang & C.-W. Kuo (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Computer Enhanced Language and Culture Learning (pp. 21 - 40). Hershey, NY: Information Science Reference, IGI Global.
  • Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2009). Supporting Learner Reflection in the Language Translation Class. Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development, 1(3), 26-48.
  • Lindgren, E., Sullivan, K. P. H., & Spelman Miller, K. (2008). Development of fluency and revision in L1 and L2 writing in Swedish high school years 8 and 9. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156, 133-151.
  • Lindgren, E., Sullivan, K. P. H., & Stevenson, M. (2008). Supporting the reflective language learner with computer keystroke logging: . In B. Barber & F. Zhang (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Computer Enhanced Language Acquisition and Learning (pp. 189 - 204). Hershey, NY: Information Science Reference, IGI Global.
  • Lindgren, E., Sullivan, K. P. H., Lindgren, U., & Spelman Miller, K. (2007). GIS for writing:applying geographical information systems techniques to data-mine writing's cognitive processes. In M. Torrance, L. Van Waes & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and Cognition: Research and Applications (Vol. 20, pp. 83-96). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Logan, F. A. (1999). Errors in Copy Typewriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1760-1773.
  • Logan, G. D. (2003). Simon-Type Effects: Chronometric Evidence for Keypress Schemata in Typewriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(4), 741-757.
  • Long, J. (1975). Effects of Randomly Delayed Visual and Auditory Feedback on Keying Performance. Ergonomics, 18(3), 337-347.
  • Long, J. (1976). Effects of Delayed Irregular Feedback on Unskilled and Skilled Keying Performance. Ergonomics, 19(2), 183-202.
  • Long, J. (1976). Visual Feedback and Skilled Keying: Differential Effects of Masking the Printed Copy and the Keyboard. Ergonomics, 19(1), 93-110.
  • Longcamp, M., Boucard, C., Gilhodes, J. C., Nazarian, B., Anton, J. L., Roth, M., et al. (2008). Learning through hand- or type-writing influences visual recognition of new graphic shapes: behavioral and functional imaging evidences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(5), 802-815.
  • Longcamp, M., Zerbato-Poudou, M.-T., & Velay, J.-L. (2005). The influence of writing practice on letter recognition in preschool children: A comparison between handwriting and typing. Acta Psychologica, 119, 67-79.
  • Lonka, K., Chow, A., Keskinen, J., Hakkarainen, K., Sandstrom , N., & Pyhalto, K. (2014). How to measure PhD. students' conceptions of academic writing - and are they related to well-being? Journal of Writing Research, 5(3), 245-269.
  • M
  • MacArthur, C. A. (2000). New tools for writing: Assistive technology for students with writing difficulties. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 85-100.
  • Mackay, D. (1987). Constraints on the theories of sequencing and timing in language perception and production. In A. Allport, D. Mackay, W. Prinz & E. Scheerer (Eds.), Language perception and production (pp. 407-429). London , Orlando: Academic Press.
  • MacNeilage, P. F. (1964). Typing errors as clues to serial ordering mechanisms in language behavior. Language and Speech, 7, 144-159.
  • MacNeilage, P. F. (1985). Serial ordering errors in speech and typing. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Phonetic linguistics: Essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged (pp. 193-201). Orlando: Academic Press.
  • MacNeilage, P. F. (1998). The frame/content Theory of evolution of speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 499-546.
  • Massaro, D. W., & Lucas, P. A. (1984). Typing letter strings varying in orthographic structure. Acta Psychologica, 57, 109-131.
  • Matsuhashi, A. (1981). Pausing and Planning: The tempo of written discourse production. Research in the Teaching of English, 15(2), 113-134.
  • Matsuhashi, A. (1982). Explorations in real-time production of written discourse. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know. The language, process, and structure of written discourse (pp. 269-290). New York: Academic Press.
  • Matsuhashi, A. (1987). Revising the plan and altering the text. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time: Modelling production processes (pp. 197-223). New York: Academic Press.
  • McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8(3), 299-325.
  • McCutchen, D. (2011). From novice to expert: Implications of language skills and writing-relevant knowledge for memory during the development of writing skill, Journal of Writing Research, 3(1), 51-68.
  • Monsell, S. (1995). Repetition and the lexicon. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. Vol.2, pp. 147-195). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • N
  • Neuwirth, C., Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2006). Introduction to Writing and Digital Media. In L. Van Waes, M. Leijten & C. Neuwirth (Eds.), Writing and Digital Media (Vol. 17, pp. 1-8). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Nilsson, M., & Kollberg, P. (1994). Trace-it 2.0 User's Manual. IPLab, Department of Numerical Analysis and Computing Science. Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Norman, D. A., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1983). Studies of Typing from the LNR Research Group. In W. E. Cooper (Ed.), Cognitive Aspects of Skilled Typewriting (pp. 45-65). New York, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer.
  • Nottbusch, G. (2009). Grammatical planning, execution and control in Written Sentence Production. Reading & Writing.
  • Nottbusch, G., Grimm, A., Weingarten, R., & Will, U. (2005). Syllabic structures in typing: Evidence from hearing-impaired writers. Reading & Writing, 18, 497-526.
  • Nottbusch, G., Weingarten, R., & Sahel, S. (2007). From written word to written sentence production. In M. Torrance, L. van Waes & D. W. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and cognition (Vol. 20, pp. 31-53). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Nottbusch, G., Weingarten, R., & Will, U. (1998). Schreiben mit der Hand und Schreiben mit dem Computer. Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie, 56, 11-27.
  • O
  • Olive, T. (2004). Memory in writing: Empirical evidences from the dual-task technique working. European Psychologist, 9(1), 32-42
  • Olive, T. (2012). Working memory in writing. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), Past, present and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology (pp. 485-503). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2002). Concurrent activation of high- and low-level production processes in written composition. Memory and Cognition, 30, 594-600.
  • Olive, T., & Piolat, A. (2002). Suppressing visual feedback in written composition : Effects on processing demands and coordination of the writing processes. International Journal of Psychology, 37(4), 209-218.
  • Olsen, R. A., & Murray, R. A. (1976). Finger motion analysis in typing of texts of varying complexity. In Proceedings of the 6th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (pp. 446-450).
  • Opdenacker, L., & Van Waes, L. (2004). Integrating Computer-Assisted Writing Tools in a Multi-Lingual Online Writing Center. Paper presented at the Computers and Writing Conference: Writing in Globalization, 2004, Honolulu, Hawaï.
  • Ostry, D. J. (1980). Execution-time movement control. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 457-468). Amsterdam: North Holland.
  • Ostry, D. J. (1983). Determinants of interkey times in typing. In W. E. Cooper (Ed.), Cognitive Aspects of Skilled Typewriting (pp. 225-246). New York, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer.
  • P
  • Pålson, E. (1998). Revision strategies in young foreign language writing. (No. TRITA-NA-P9802, IPLab-143). Stockholm: Department of Computing Science, Royal Institute of Technology.
  • Pålson, E., Kollberg, P., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (1997). Young writers' revision strategies: a study of Swedish learners of English. Paper presented at the Writing the future: Writer and Computer 10, Brighton, UK.
  • Parasher, R., Roy, S., & Gordon, A. W. (2001). Effector-dependent acquisition of novel typing sequences. Experimental Brain Research, 136(3), 386-393.
  • Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Clark, R. J. (2011). Writing in natural sciences: Understanding the effects of different types of reviewers on the writing process. Journal of Writing Research, 2(3), 365-393.
  • Perrin, D. (1998). Analyzing text progression at the writer's workplace. A theory-based tool for the writing coach. Paper presented at the European Writing Conference, Poitiers, France.
  • Perrin, D. (2002). Progression analysis: Investigating writing strategies in the workplace. In T. Olive & C. M. Levy (Eds.), Comtemporary tools and techniques for studying writing. . Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Perrin, D. (2003). Progression analysis:Investigating writing strategies at the workplace. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(6), 907-921.
  • Perrin, Daniel (2012). Coming to grips with dynamics and complexity. Methodological challenges to real-life writing research. In Andrea Ender, Adrian Leemannn & Bernhard Wälchli (Eds.), Methods in contemporary linguistics (pp. 383-405). Berlin et al.: De Gruyter.
  • Perrin, Daniel, & Grésillon, Almuth (2013). Methodology. From speaking about writing to tracking text production. In Daniel Perrin & Eva-Maria Jakobs (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (Vol. 10). New York et al.: De Gruyter.
  • Pifarre, M., & Fisher, R. (2011). Breaking up the writing process: how wikis can support understanding the composition and revision strategies of young writers. Language and Education, 25(5), 451-466.
  • Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2004). Cognitive effort during notetaking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1-22.
  • Piolat, A., Olive, T., Roussey, J. Y., Thunin, O., & Ziegler, J. C. (1999). SCRIPTKELL: a computer assisted tool for measuring the distribution of time and cognitive effort in writing and other complex cognitive activities. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 31(1), 113-121.
  • Piolat, A., Roussey, J. Y., Olive, T., & Amada, M. (2004). Processing time and cognitive effort in revision: effects of error type and of working memory capacity. In L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, P. Largy & Y. Rouiller (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and Instructional Processes (pp. 21-38). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Price, J. (1997). Electronic outlining as a tool for making writing visible. Computers and Composition, 14, 409-427.
  • Q
  • Quené, H., & Van den Bergh, H. (2004). On Multi-Level Modeling of data from repeated measures designs: A tutorial. Speech Communication, 43(1-2), 103-121.
  • Quené, H., & Van den Bergh, H. (In Press). Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data. Journal of Memory and Language.
  • Quinlan, T. (2002). Speech recognition technology and the writing processes of students with writing difficulties. Paper presented at the Earli Sig Writing 2002, Stafford, England.
  • Quinlan, T. (2006). Young Writers and Digital Scribes. In L. Van Waes, M. Leijten & C. Neuwirth (Eds.), Writing and Digital Media (Vol. 17, pp. 21-29). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Quinlan, T. G., Loncke, M., Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2012). Coordinating the cognitive processes of writing: The role of the monitor. Written Communication, 29, 345-368
  • Quinlan, T., Loncke, M., Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (in preparation). Writers juggling error-correcting with sentence generation. Educational Testing Service, University of Ghent, University of Antwerp.
  • R
  • Rabbitt, P. (1978). Detection of errors by skilled typists. Ergonomics, 21, 945-958.
  • Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1966). Error Correction Time without External Error Signals. Nature, 212(22 October 1966), 438.
  • Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1978). Detection of Errors by Skilled Typists. Ergonomics, 21(11), 945-958.
  • Rabbitt, P. M. A., & Phillips, S. (1967). Error-detection and correction latencies as a function of S-R compatibility. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19(1), 37-42.
  • Raedts, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., Van Waes, L., & Daems, F. (2007). Observational Learning through Video-Based Models: Impact on Students' Accuracy of Self-Efficacy Beliefs, Task Knowledge and Writing Performance. In P. Boscolo & S. Hidi (Eds.), Writing and Motivation (Vol. 19, pp. 219-238). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Ransdell, S. E., & Hecht, S. A. (2003). Time and resource limits on working memory: Cross-age consistency in counting span performance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 303-313.
  • Ransdell, S. E., & Levy, C. M. (1996). Working memory constraints on writing quality and fluency. In C. M. Levy & S. E. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications (pp. 93-105). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ransdell, S. E., & Levy, C. M. (1999). Writing reading and speaking memory spans and the importance of resource flexibility. In M. Torrance & G. Jeffery (Eds.), The cognitive demands of writing: processing capacity and working memory effects in text production. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Ransdell, S. E., Levy, C. M., & Kellogg, R. T. (2002). The structure of writing processes as revealed by secondary task deman. L-1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature 2(2), 141-163.
  • Rayner, K. (2004). Future directions for eye movement research. Studies in Psychology and Behavior, 2, 489-496.
  • Rayner, K., & Juhasz, B. J. (2004). Eye movements in reading: Old questions and new directions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 340-352.
  • Rayner, K., Juhasz, B. J., & Pollatsek, A. (2005). Eye movements during reading. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The Science of Reading: A Handbook (pp. 79-97). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Reece, J., & Cumming, G. (1996). Evaluating speech-based composition methods: Planning, dictation, and the listening word processor. In C. M. Levy & S. E. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications (pp. 361-380). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.
  • Rieger, M. (2004). Automatic keypress activation in skilled typing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(3), 555-566.
  • Rijlaarsdam, G., Braaksma, M., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Raedts, M., Steendam, E., ... & Van den Bergh, H. (2008). Observation of peers in learning to write. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 53-83.
  • Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1982). Simulating a skilled typist: A study of skilled cognitive-motor performance. Cognitive Science, 6, 1-36.
  • S
  • Sahel, S., Nottbusch, G., Grimm, A., & Weingarten, R. (2008). Written production of German compounds: Effects of lexical frequency and semantic transparency. Written Language and Literacy, 11(2), 211-228.
  • Sahel, S., Nottbusch, G., Weingarten, R., & Blanken, G. (2005). The role of phonology and syllabic structure in the time course of typing: Evidence from aphasia. Linguistische Berichte(201), 65-87.
  • Salthouse, T. A. (1984). Effects of age and skill in typing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(3), 345-371.
  • Salthouse, T. A. (1985). Anticipatory Processing in Transcription Typing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(2), 264-271.
  • Salthouse, T. A. (1986). Perceptual, cognitive, and motoric aspects of transcription typing. Psychological Bulletin, 99(3), 303-319.
  • Schilperoord, J. (1996). It's about time: Temporal aspects of cognitive processes in text production. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.
  • Schilperoord, J. (2002). On the cognitive status of pauses in discourse production. In T. Olive & C. M. Levy (Eds.), Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing (Vol. 10, pp. 61-88). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Selzer, J. (1984). Exploring options in composing. . College Composition and Communication, 35, 276-284.
  • Severinson Eklundh, K. (1990). Global strategies in computer based writing: the use of logging data. Paper presented at the Second Nordic Conference on Text Comprehension in Man and Machine, Stockholm.
  • Severinson Eklundh, K. (1992). Problems in achieving a global perspective on the text in computer based writing. Instructional Science(21), 73-84.
  • Severinson Eklundh, K. (1994). Linear and non-linear strategies in computer-based writing. Computers and Composition(11), 203-216.
  • Severinson Eklundh, K. S. (1994). Linear and Non-linear strategies in computer-based writing. Computers and Composition, 11, 203-216.
  • Severinson Eklundh, K. S., & Kollberg, P. (1992). Translating keystroke records into a general notation for the writing process (IPLab-59). Stockholm: Department of Numerical Analysis and Computing Science, Royal Institute of Technology.
  • Severinson Eklundh, K. S., & Kollberg, P. (1996). Computer tools for tracing the writing process: From keystroke records to S-notation. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. Van den Bergh & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, Models and Methodology in writing research (pp. 526-541). Amsterdam: University Press.
  • Severinson Eklundh, K. S., & Kollberg, P. (2003). Emerging discourse structure: Computer-assisted episode analysis as a window to global revision in university students' writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 869-891.
  • Severinson Eklundh, K., & Kollberg, P. (1996). A computer tool and framework for analysing on-line revisions. In C. M. Levy & S. Randsdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 163-188). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Severinson Eklundh, K., & Kollberg, P. (1996). Computer tools for tracing the writing process: From keystroke records to S-notation. . In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. Van den Bergh & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Current research in writing: Theories, models and methodology (pp. 526-541). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Severinson Eklundh, K., & Kollberg, P. (2002). Studying writers' revision patterns with S-notation analysis. In T. Olive & C. M. Levy (Eds.), Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing. . Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Severinson Eklundh, K., & Kollberg, P. (2003). Emerging discourse structure: computer-assisted episode analysis as a window to global revision in university students' writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(6), 869-891.
  • Severinson Eklundh, K., Kollberg, P., & ., I. E. p. (1996). A computer tool and framework for analysing on-line revisions. In C. M. Levy & S. Randsdell (Eds.), The science of writing Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Shaffer, L. H. (1973). Latency mechanisms in transcription. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (Vol. 4, pp. 435-446). New York: Academic Press.
  • Shaffer, L. H. (1975). Control processes in typing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 419-432.
  • Shaffer, L. H. (1976). Intention and Performance. Psychological Review, 83, 375-393.
  • Shaffer, L. H. (1978). Timing in the motor programming of typing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 333-345.
  • Shaffer, L. H. (1984). Motor programming in language production: A tutorial review. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance. Control of language processes (Vol. Vol.10, pp. 17-41). Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.
  • Shaffer, L. H., & Hardwick, J. (1968). Typing performance as a function of text. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 360-369.
  • Sharples, M. (1999). How We Write: Writing as Creative Design. London: Routledge.
  • Sharples, M., & Pemberton, L. (1992). Representing writing: External representations and the writing process. In P. O'Brian Holt & N. Williams (Eds.), Computers and Writing: State of the art (pp. 319-336). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Shulansky, J. D., & Herrmann, D. J. (1977). The influence of linguistic structure on typing. Language and Speech, 20(1), 80-85.
  • Simpson, S., & Torrance, M. (2007). EyeWrite (Version 5.1).
  • Sleurs, K., Jacobs, G., & Van Waes, L. (2002). Constructing press releases: Quotations as preformulation (Working Paper Faculty of Business Economics, University of Antwerp).
  • Smagorinsky, P. (1989). The reliability and validity of protocol analysis. Written communication, 6, 463-479.
  • Soechting, J. F., & Flanders, M. (1997). Flexibility and Repeatability of Finger Movements During Typing: Analysis of Multiple Degrees of Freedom. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 4(1), 29-46.
  • Sole, I., Miras, M., Castells, N., Espino, S., & Minguela, M. (2013). Integrating information: An analysis of the processes involved and the products generated in a written synthesis task. Written Communication, 30, 63-90.
  • Sommers, N. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication, 31(4), 378-388.
  • Spelman Miller, K. (1996). Different tasks, different processes? An investigation of revision behaviour on two academic tasks. In A. Archibald & F. Jeffrey (Eds.), Second Language Acquisition and writing: a multidisciplinary approach (pp. 143-151). Southampton: University of Southampton.
  • Spelman Miller, K. (1997). Investigating writing on-line: an illustration of methodology and analysis (No. Working Papers, vol. 3). Reading: Department of Linguistic Science, University of Reading.
  • Spelman Miller, K. (1998). Teaching Writing. Teaching Speaking. In K. Johnson & H. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Linguistics (pp. 341-352). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Spelman Miller, K. (1999). Investigating academic writing on-line: a study of temporal aspects of text production. In M. Pennington (Ed.), Writing in an Electronic Environment: Research with Language Learners. . Houston, Texas: Athelstan.
  • Spelman Miller, K. (2000). Academic writers on-line: investigating pausing in the production of text. Language Teaching Research,, 4(2), 123-148.
  • Spelman Miller, K. (2000). Writing on-line: Temporal features of First and Second Language Written Text Production (Unpublished PhD thesis). Unpublished Unpublished PhD thesis. The University of Reading.
  • Spelman Miller, K. (2002). Units of production in writing: towards a discourse perspective. In S. Burgess (Ed.), Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses. Tenerife: University La Laguna.
  • Spelman Miller, K. (2006). Pausing, productivity and the processing of topic in on-line writing. In E. L. Sullivan (Ed.), Computer Keystroke Logging:Methods and Applications (Vol. 18, pp. 131-155). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Spelman Miller, K. (2006). The pausological study of written language production. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer Keystroke Logging:Methods and Applications (Vol. 18, pp. 11-30). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Spelman Miller, K., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2006). Keystroke logging - an introduction. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer Keystroke Logging and Writing: Methods and Applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Spelman Miller, K., Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2008). The psycholinguistic dimension in second language writing: opportunities for research and pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 433 - 454.
  • Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). Latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparison of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 117-152). New York: Academic Press.
  • Strömqvist, S., & Ahlsén, E. (1999). The process of writing - a process report (Gothenburg papers in theoretical linguistics 83). Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg, Department of Linguistics.
  • Strömqvist, S., & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.). (2004). Relating events in narrative - typologiocal and contextual perspectives. Mahwah, NewJersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Strömqvist, S., & Wengelin, A. (2000). The temporal distribution of actions in on-line writing. In E. Esperét (Ed.), Writing and learning to write at the dawn of the 21st century (Proceedings of the European writing conference). Poitiers: Université de Poitiers.
  • Strömqvist, S., Holmqvist, K., Johansson, V., Karlsson, H., & Wengelin, Å. (2006). What key-logging can reveal about writing. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer Key-stroke Logging and Writing: Methods and Applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Strömqvist, S., Holmqvist, K., Johansson, V., Karlsson, H., & Wengelin, Å. (2006). What keystroke logging can reveal about writing. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer Keystroke Logging:Methods and Applications (Vol. 18, pp. 45-71). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Strömqvist, S., Karlsson, H., & :, l. (2002). ScriptLog for Windows - User's Manual (Technical Report. University of Lund). Lund / Stravanger: Department of Linguistics, and University College of Stavanger: Centre for Reading Research.
  • Strömqvist, S., Nordqvist, Å., & Wengelin, Å. (2004). Writing the frog story - developmental and cross-modal perspectives. . In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative - typologiocal and contextual perspectives (pp. 359-394). Mahwah, NewJersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Sullivan, K. P. H., & Lindgren, E. (2002). Self-assessment in autonomous computer-aided L2 writing. ELT Journal, 56(3), 258-266.
  • Sullivan, K. P. H., & Lindgren, E. (2006). Computer Key-Stroke Logging and Writing. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
  • Sullivan, K. P. H., & Lindgren, E. (2006). Digital Tools for the Recording, the Logging and the Analysis of Writing Processes: Introduction, Overview and Framework. In C. Neuwirth, L. Van Waes & M. Leijten (Eds.), Writing and Digital Media. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Sullivan, K. P. H., & Lindgren, E. (2006). Supporting learning, exploring theory and looking forward with keystroke logging. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer Keystroke Logging:Methods and Applications (Vol. 18, pp. 203-211). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Sullivan, K. P. H., Kollberg, P., & Pålson, E. (1998). Trace-it - a computer tool with application to the second language classroom. BABEL: Journal of the Australian Federation of Modern Language Teachers Associations Inc., 33(1), 22-27.
  • Sullivan, K. P. H., Kollberg, P., Severinson-Eklundh, K., & Pålson, E. (1997). L2 writing: A pilot investigation using key-stroke logging. In L. Diaz & C. Pérez (Eds.), Views on the acquisition and use of a second language (pp. 553-566). Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
  • T
  • Terzuolo, C. A., & Viviani, P. (1980). Determinants and characteristics of motor patterns used for typing. Neuroscience, 5, 1085-1103.
  • Thomas, E. A. C., & Jones, R. G. (1970). A model for subjective grouping in typewriting. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 353-367.
  • Thorson, H. (2002). Using the Computer to Compare Foreign and Native Language Writing Processes: A Statistical and Case Study Approach. Modern Language Journal, 84(55-70).
  • Tillema, M. (2012). Writing in first and second language: Empirical studies on text quality and writing processes. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Utrecht University.
  • Tillema, M., Van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Sanders, T. (2011). Relating self reports of writing behaviour and online task execution using a temporal model. Metacognition Learning, 6, 229-253. doi: 10.1007/s11409-011-9072-x
  • Torrance, M., & Gabraith, D. (2006). The processing demands of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 468). New York: Guilford Publications.
  • Torrance, M., Thomas, G. V., & Robinson, E. J. (2000). Individual differences in undergraduate essay-writing strategies: a longitudinal study. Higher Education, 39, 181-200.
  • Torrance, M., Van Waes, L., & Galbraith, D. (Eds.). (2007). Writing and Cognition: Research and Applications (Vol. 20). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Troia, G. A., Harbaugh, A. G., Shankland, R. K., Wolbers, K. A., & M., L. A. (2013). Relationships between writing motivation, writing activity, and writing performace: effects of grade, sex, and ability. Reading and Writing, 26(1), 17-44. doi: 10.1007/s11145-012-9379-2
  • U
  • Usoof, H., & Lindgren, E. (2008). Who is who and doing what in distance education? Journal of Research on Teacher Education, 3(4), 173 - 185.
  • V
  • Van den Haak, M. J., De Jong, M. D. T., & Schellens, P. J. (2003). Retrospective versus concurrent think-aloud protocols: Testing the usability of an online library catalogue. Behaviour and Information Technology, 22(5), 339-351.
  • Van den Haak, M. J., De Jong, M. D. T., & Schellens, P. J. (2004). Employing think-aloud protocols and constructive interaction to test the usability of online library catalogues: A methodological comparison. Interacting with Computers, 16, 1153-1170.
  • Van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. London: Academic Press.
  • Van Waes, L. (1994). Writing and computers: Implications for the Teaching of Writing. In K.-H. Pogner (Ed.), More about Writing (pp. 41-61). Odense: Odens Universitets Trykkeri.
  • Van Waes, L. (1998). Evaluating on-line and off-line searching behavior: using thinking-aloud protocols to detect navigation barriers. In L. Bennett & et al (Eds.), Scaling the heights: The future of information technology (pp. 180-186). Québec: ACM Sigdoc.
  • Van Waes, L. (2000). Thinking aloud as a method for testing the usability of websites: The influence of task variation on the evaluation of hypertext. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43(3), 279-291.
  • Van Waes, L. (2001). Testing usability tests for web sites: an evaluation of task variation in think aloud sessions. In M. Hirose (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT'01 (pp. 771-772). Chicago/Tokyo/London: IOS Press.
  • Van Waes, L., & Schellens, P. J. (1998). Writing Profiles. The effects of the Word Processor on Pausing and Revision Patterns. Antwerpen.
  • Van Waes, L., & Schellens, P. J. (2003). Writing profiles: the effect of the writing mode on pausing and revision patterns of experienced writers. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 829-853.
  • Van Waes, L., & Van Herreweghe, L. (1995). Computerprotokolle in der Schreibprozessforschung. Der Gebrauch von Keytrap als Observationsinstrument. In E.-M. Jakobs, D. Knorr & S. Molitor-Lübbert (Eds.), Wissenschaftliche Textproduktion mit un ohne Computer (pp. 35-52). Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.
  • Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., & Neuwirth, C. (Eds.). (2006). Writing and Digital Media (Vol. 17). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., & Quinlan, T. (2010). Reading during sentence composing and error correction: A multilevel analysis of the influences of task complexity. Reading and Writing, 23(7), pp 803-834.
  • Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., & Quinlan, T. (in press). Reading during sentence composing and error correction: A multilevel analysis of the influences of task complexity. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.
  • Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., & Van der Geest, T. (2006). Themanummer: Methoden en instrumenten voor schrijf- en leesonderzoek [SPECIAL ISSUE: Methods and Instruments for Reading and Writing Research]. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 28(3).
  • Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., Wengelin, A., & Lindgren, E. (2012). Logging tools to study digital writing processes. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology (pp. 507-533). New York/Sussex: Taylor & Francis. [ISBN: 9781848729636]
  • Van Weijen, D. (2009). Writing processes, text quality, and task effects: Empirical studies in first and second language writing. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Utrecht University.
  • Van Weijen, D. (2009). Writing profiles, learning styles and bad news letters (Quadem Internal report). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Viviani, P., & Laissard, G. (1996). Motor templates in typing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(2), 417-445.
  • Viviani, P., & Terzuolo, C. A. (1980). Space-time invariance in learned motor skills. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 525-533). Amsterdam: North Holland.
  • Viviani, P., & Terzuolo, C. A. (1982). On the relation between word-specific patterns and the central control model of typing: A reply to Gentner. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8(6), 811-813.
  • Viviani, P., & Terzuolo, C. A. (1982). Trajectory determines movement dynamics. Neuroscience, 7, 431-437.
  • Viviani, P., & Terzuolo, C. A. (1983). The Organization of Movement in Handwriting and Typing. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Development, writing and other language processes (Vol. 2, pp. 103-146). London: Academic Press.
  • W
  • Walvoord, B. E., Anderson, V. J., Breihan, J. R., McCarthy, L. P., Robison, S. M., & Sherman, A. K. (1995). Funtions of outlining among college students in four disciplines. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 390-421.
  • Weingarten, R., Nottbusch, G., & Will, U. (2004). Morphemes, syllables, and graphemes in written word production. In T. Pechmann & C. Habel (Eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to language production (pp. 529-572). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Wells, F. L. (1916). On the psychomotor mechanisms of typewriting. The American Journal of Psychology, 27, 47-70.
  • Wengelin, Å. (2000). Errors and revisions in the writing of adults with severe reading and writing difficulties. Paper presented at the AILA-Conference (CD-Rom), Tokyo.
  • Wengelin, Å. (2001). Disfluencies in writing - are they like disfluencies in speaking? Paper presented at the Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech, University of Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • Wengelin, Å. (2001). From the "Dyslexia Classroom" to the "Classroom for Reading and Writing Difficulties"- How do Spelling Difficulties Influence the Text Production? In W. Vagle & K. Wikberg (Eds.), New Directions in Nordic Text Linguistics and Discourse Analysis: Methodological Issues. Oslo: Novus.
  • Wengelin, Å. (2002). Text production in adults with reading and writing difficulties (Ph.D. thesis). Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University.
  • Wengelin, Å. (2006). Examining pauses in writing: Theory, methods and empirical data. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer Key-Stroke Logging and Writing (Vol. 19, pp. 107-130). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
  • Wengelin, Å. (2007). The word level focus in text production by adults with reading and writing difficulties. In D. Galbraith, M. Torrance & L. Van Waes (Eds.), Writing and Cognition. Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Wengelin, Å. w. J., V.,& Strömqvist, S.). (2006). Examining pauses in writing:theory,methods and empirical data. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer Keystroke Logging:Methods and Applications. Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Wengelin, Å., & () , i. e., , Department of linguistics, . (1999). Pauses and editings in the written language production of adults with and without severe reading and writing difficulties. In S. Strömqvist & E. Ahlsén (Eds.), The Process of Writing: a progress report (Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 83). Gothenburg Department of linguistics, Göteborg University.
  • Wengelin, Å., & Strömqvist, S. (2000). Discourse level writing in dyslexics - methods, results and implications for diagnosis. Scandinavian Journal of Logopedics, phoniatrics and vocology, 25(1), 22-28.
  • Wengelin, A. (2006). Examining pauses in writing: Theories, methods and empirical data. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer Key-Stroke logging and Writing: Methods and Applications (Vol. 18, pp. 107-130). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Wengelin, A., Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2010). Studying reading during writing: new perspectives in research. Reading and Writing, 23(7), 735-742.
  • Wengelin, A., Torrance, M., Holmqvist, K., Simpson, S., Galbraith, D., Johansson, V., & Johansson, R. (2009). Combined eyetracking and keystroke-logging methods for studying cognitive processes in text production. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 337-351.
  • Wengelin, A., Torrance, M., Holmqvist, K., Simpson, S., Galbraith, D., Johansson, V., et al. (2009). Combined eye-tracking and keystroke-logging methods for studying cognitive processes in text production. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 337-351.
  • West, L. J. (1967). Vision and Kinesthesis in the Acquisition of Typewriting Skill. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51(2), 161-166.
  • West, L. J., & Sabban, Y. (1982). Hierarchy of stroking habits at the typewriter. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 370-376.
  • Will, U., Nottbusch, G., & Weingarten, R. (2006). Linguistic units in word typing: Effects of word presentation modes and typing delay. Written Language and Literacy, 9(1), 156-173.
  • Will, U., Weingarten, R., Nottbusch, G., & Albes, C. (2002). Linguistische Rahmen und segmentale Informationen bei der Einzelwortschreibung: Evidenzen aus Zeitstrukturen und Fehlerverteilungen. In C. Habel & T. Pechmann (Eds.), Sprachproduktion. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
  • Will, U., Weingarten, R., Nottbusch, G., & Albes, C. (2003). Linguistic units, hierarchies and dynamics in typing. from http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/lili/personen/gnottbusch/doc/Linguistic_units.pdf
  • Williams, J. D., & Takaku, S. (2011). Help seeking, self-efficacy, and writing performance among college students. Journal of Writing Research, 3(1), 1-18.
  • Williams, N., Hartley, P., & Pittard, V. (2004). Talking to write: Investigating the practical impast and theoretical implications of speech recognition (SR) software on real writing tasks. In L. Van Waes, D. Gabraith & M. Torrance (Eds.), Recent developments in writing process research (Vol. 2): Kluwer.
  • Wininger, M. (2014). Measuring the evolution of a revised document. Journal of Writing Research, 6(1), 1-28.
  • Z
  • Zesiger, P., Orliaguet, J.-P., Boë, L.-J., & Mounoud, P. (1994). The influence of syllabic structure in handwriting and typing production. In C. Faure, P. Keuss, G. Lorette & A. Vinter (Eds.), Advances in handwriting and drawing (pp. 389-401). Paris: Europia.